The only way to non-half-ass it is if I had help from people such as the three I named, especially since if Approach were forked and made Linux-native, the existing and new users would all benefit from all the reasons Approach won awards in the 90s. I am debating opening up my app this year, but I don't want to do it half-assed.
#.lwp files lotus symphony how to
If I knew how to program, or could win a lottery, I could just pay someone to mimic Approach and some of 1-2-3, then totally re-write my screenplay app and spin it out as OS-agnostic, Linux-Mac-Win friendly, no registry bullshit, but only proper app-and-user-folder-activation constraints with a distinc activation code based on installation hash results and user/licensee name (so the user could install it on multiple machines owned by him/her). Too bad they are too busy, or I am a poor presenter, or have poor posting history and the like. I would only trust opening that up to Julian Smart (of Anthemion Software, the writer developer of StoryLines, along with his wife Harriet), Sue Sloan, and Mitch. I have a screenplay app that I started building in 2006 and I am terrified to open it up to the public because it does a number of things that NONE of the other screenplay apps does. If they could pull that off, and if Mitch still has any "startup mode" fire in him, I'd begggggggggggg him to do it. I wish that Mitch Kapoor and Sue Sloan would team up and just take Approach off of IBMs hands, or cajole IBM into allowing them to fork it. I also make heavvvvy use of Lotus Approach. No other spreadsheet app I have used can do that. The ability to edit the values in a cell simply by dragging a control point on a line chart. Re: Preferred The ONLY think I think I like about excel is.
Even character mapped pseudo-GUIs needed a lot more memory to deal with all of the needed buffering.īy the time most machines had adequate resources, too many of Lotus' developers had been reduced to mere shells of men, and the company never really got its footing in the GUI world, except for acquired crews like the Ami folks. By then Lotus had already gone last past deadline learning how memory hungry a GUI environment is compared to something like DOS.
It wasn't until the 512K model and upgrades appeared that anyone sane would try to run their business on a Mac.
#.lwp files lotus symphony mac
The 128K Mac simply wasn't a practical product for anything beyond short Mac Write docs and showing the potential of what GUI could become. They poured huge resources into trying to do something truly new on a platform that simply couldn't support it. When the original 128K Mac launched they announced an integrated all-dancing all-singing package called Jazz that nearly wrecked the company. Re: Preferred had a horrible time trying to wrap their heads around GUI.
0 kommentar(er)
